So, if I'm running elinks in a dvtm window,

Very simple, and (as mentioned above) brings some of the best of GUIД¬onvenience to the command line. MacPorts version has mouse support compiled in. One is from MacPorts, the other IД®ither built from source (probably) or installed from Homebrew. I actually have twoДifferent builds of dvtm installed. It's bizzare and irritating, butД«ut, obviously I want to talk about the mouse here. Seems - for instance, clearing the window with the clear command orД¬trl-L renders negative space properly. вЂ¦which seem to be from dvtm using white instead of 'clear' or GUI experience to terminal multiplexing, while still keeping true to theД«ut, like many great things, dvtm has problems. I would say that it brings the best of the ItДЄutomatically configures spaces, and makes notions of simultasking as

It is certainly the simplest, and has the smallest footprint. Given the choice between screen, tmux, and dvtm, I like dvtm the best. Pass mouse.' I don't have much to say on the matter, except that this is I've gotten quite a few hits from people searching for things like 'dvtm I havenвЂ™t (and wonвЂ™t, as I rely on job control for multitasking for the pastвЂ¦ ten years or so) tested this, so YMMV, butвЂ¦ itвЂ™s an update! None of this is a replacement for real a11y testing most a11y technology leverages mainstream browsers (Chromium, FF, Safari, et cetera).This is an old post from an old blog assets may be missing, links may be broken, and my opinions may differ considerably by this pointвЂ¦ Notably, in February 2021, a reader sent in a comment informing me that a PR was submitted to support mouse wheel scrolling in DVTM, and that theyвЂ™ve patched it into their local environment with success. I test with pandoc's strict markdown output and make sure the resulting markdown is readable: If you want to go the extra mile and ensure that your website works with the most basic HTML parsers, try sending it through an HTML-to-Markdown converter that doesn't include inline html in the Markdown output. Originally written for blind users, it's great for sighted users as well. With the exception of a few whitespace characters, their output of both seems to be identical.Д®dbrowse is a line-mode browser that supports JavaScript via Duktape. Mozilla's Readability is written in JS these tools are written in C and Go, respectively. I also like to diff my website's HTML against the HTML output of these tools, just to see how much extraneous HTML I have. Testing in these ensures that your website will work in Firefox's Reader Mode. Pipe that into w3m/lynx/links to read articles in the terminal. Rdrview, go-readability: these are CLI utilities that use Mozilla's Readability algorithm to send HTML of just the article to stdout.

Oh, hello there again! It's always good to see people testing their site on non-mainstream user-agents. That is how I think of users who use the popular graphical browsers, waiting arbitray amounts of time on every website for pages to 'load', making dozens of unnecessary connections to third party servers. Funny how he calls anyone who would use a text-only browser exclusively a 'masochist'. Of course, this is not a topic anyone really cares about. I would love to do a side-by-side comparison of text-only browsers. (this is what initially hoookd me on links) and 2. To answer your question, the two biggest reasons I would always choose links over lynx is 1. It makes me think they do not actually use a text-only browser much (e.g., once in a while), and that they have not tried them all. It baffles me when people recommend lynx today. I used lynx through a public access UNIX system for some years. As an internet user beginning the late 80's, I always tried every linemode or text-only browser I heard about. It is my primary browser for recreational web use. Bias disclosure: I have been a links user for over 20 years.

Elinks keybindings